Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookmeyer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brookmeyer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Biostatistics 2:233-247 (2001)
© 2001 Oxford University Press

The statistical analysis of truncated data: application to the Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak

Ron Brookmeyer, Natalie Blades, Martin Hugh-Jones and Donald A. Henderson

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
The Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies, and the School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

An outbreak of anthrax occurred in the city of Sverdlovsk in Russia in the spring of 1979. The outbreak was due to the inhalation of spores that were accidentally released from a military microbiology facility. In response to the outbreak a public health intervention was mounted that included distribution of antibiotics and vaccine. The objective of this paper is to develop and apply statistical methodology to analyse the Sverdlovsk outbreak, and in particular to estimate the incubation period of inhalational anthrax and the number of deaths that may have been prevented by the public health intervention. The data available for analysis from this common source epidemic are the incubation periods of reported deaths. The statistical problem is that incubation periods are truncated because some individuals may have had their deaths prevented by the public health interventions and thus are not included in the data. However, it is not known how many persons received the intervention or how efficacious was the intervention. A likelihood function is formulated that accounts for the effects of truncation. The likelihood is decomposed into a binomial likelihood with unknown sample size and a conditional likelihood for the incubation periods. The methods are extended to allow for a phase-in of the intervention over time. Assuming a lognormal model for the incubation period distribution, the median and mean incubation periods were estimated to be 11.0 and 14.2 days respectively. These estimates are longer than have been previously reported in the literature. The death toll from the Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak could have been about 14% larger had there not been a public health intervention; however, the confidence intervals are wide (95% CI 0–61%). The sensitivity of the results to model assumptions and the parametric model for the incubation period distribution are investigated. The results are useful for determining how long antibiotic therapy should be continued in suspected anthrax cases and also for estimating the ultimate number of deaths in a new outbreak in the absence of any public health interventions.

Keywords: Anthrax; Common source outbreak; Incubation period; Likelihood; Truncation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. A. Wilkening
Modeling the Incubation Period of Inhalational Anthrax
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 593 - 605.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. S. Zaric, D. M. Bravata, J.-E. Cleophas Holty, K. M. McDonald, D. K. Owens, and M. L. Brandeau
Modeling the Logistics of Response to Anthrax Bioterrorism
Med Decis Making, June 1, 2008; 28(3): 332 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. A. Wilkening
Sverdlovsk revisited: Modeling human inhalation anthrax
PNAS, May 16, 2006; 103(20): 7589 - 7594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J.-E. C. Holty, D. M. Bravata, H. Liu, R. A. Olshen, K. M. McDonald, and D. K. Owens
Systematic review: a century of inhalational anthrax cases from 1900 to 2005.
Ann Intern Med, February 21, 2006; 144(4): 270 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
D. L. Craft, L. M. Wein, and A. H. Wilkins
Analyzing Bioterror Response Logistics: The Case of Anthrax
Management Science, May 1, 2005; 51(5): 679 - 694.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Brookmeyer, E. Johnson, and R. Bollinger
Modeling the optimum duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in an anthrax outbreak
PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 10129 - 10132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. M. Wein, D. L. Craft, and E. H. Kaplan
Emergency response to an anthrax attack
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4346 - 4351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. J. Lanska
Anthrax meningoencephalitis
Neurology, August 13, 2002; 59(3): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. V. Inglesby, T. O'Toole, D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher, E. Eitzen, A. M. Friedlander, J. Gerberding, J. Hauer, J. Hughes, et al.
Anthrax as a Biological Weapon, 2002: Updated Recommendations for Management
JAMA, May 1, 2002; 287(17): 2236 - 2252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Brookmeyer and N. Blades
Prevention of Inhalational Anthrax in the U.S. Outbreak
Science, March 8, 2002; 295(5561): 1861 - 1861.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.